SQUEAKING PIPS BOOKS
  • Home
  • BOOKS
  • Blog
  • About
    • The Story Behind Saint Maggie
The Squeaking Blog

Disjuncture

4/19/2018

 
Picture
When I was an adjunct professor and teaching classes that involved history, it was not unusual for a student to raise a hand and say, “Prof, if Thomas Jefferson was so great, why did he own slaves?”
​
But it isn’t just Jefferson. If you pick any historic figure who did something amazing or forward-thinking or just brilliant, you usually will find something that is “backward” or oppressive or, even, just plain stupid.

Why is that?

In short, because they’re human and they didn’t live in a vacuum.

Over the course of time, historical heroes become idolized. We tend to reduce them to basics and remove them from their location in history. So, when we learn something new about them we may feel let down or confused.

Here’s an example: Lincoln pondered sending freed slaves to Liberia. But how could the guy who wrote the Emancipation Proclamation even toy with the idea of sending away the very people he freed? Answer: because he lived in the nineteenth century and no one had a clue what to do with a large group of formerly enslaved, now-freed human beings. What would they do for a living? Where would they live? How would they live? The nation’s leadership had a limited imagination. The governmental and cultural tools on hand were not up to the task. And let’s not forget all that was mixed up with racist and prejudiced attitudes that had developed over centuries. And that is how a seemingly brilliant and compassionate man could also be seemingly uncaring and cold.

The truth is human beings, regardless of their impact on history, are still human beings located in a specific time, and it is helpful to see their actions, words, and thoughts in that light. I don’t say this to let them off the hook. I’m saying it more as a way of helping us get over our shock when our heroes do not live up to the hype.

A similar challenge exists when writing fiction, whether it is historical or otherwise. Characters need to be complicated and rooted in their time.

Let’s look at Eli and Maggie Smith.

Eli is quite supportive of Maggie. In fact, although she enjoys writing, she previously had understood her primary responsibilities to be running a boarding house and raising her daughters. She would have liked to have written professionally but believed that other things demanded her allegiance. Maggie therefore had a very nineteenth-century “woman’s sphere” take on life, to the point that she turned her boarders into family. In her mind, Maggie was keeping house, rather than running a business. Eli is the one who sort of helps her get “woke.”

He encourages Maggie to edit and write articles for his newspaper. And he stands up for her when she embarks on new, and possibly controversial undertakings, such as a school for children of color (found in my current work-in-progress). Eli steps up takes care of the children, even to the point of giving Bob baths and changing Faith’s diapers.

So, kudos to Eli for being an enlightened man and freeing Maggie to follow her muse!

Oh, wait, a minute. Have you ever seen that guy do the dusting? Or doing the back-breaking weekly task called the laundry? And when did he ever cook? Okay, he did roast things over a fire while he and Carson were following their muses and covering the war as correspondents. But has Eli ever cooked at home to give Maggie a break? Hell to the no! In fact no to all three of those things.

How could such a loving, enlightened man like Eli not see that his wife just might need help with the housework? Answer: because he’s a nineteenth-century man. He lives in a culture that presupposes men are not supposed to do housework. So, as forward-thinking as he appears to be, Eli does hit a cultural wall.

I can point out more things that illustrate how my characters might have absorbed the norms of their times verses other, more enlightened behavior, but that would take more time than I have today and probably way more than you want to read.

To sum up, what is true in fiction is true in real life, and what is true in real life is true in fiction. Everyone is flawed in some way and everyone is located in time, and that includes historical heroes.

Disjuncture is more normal than it is hypocritical.

Perhaps disjuncture is simply “being human.”

Comments are closed.

    Authors

    Janet Stafford, Squeaking Pips Founder

    ​

    Archives

    August 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    November 2021
    September 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    November 2017
    October 2017
    June 2017

    Categories

    All

    RSS Feed

    Questions: jrstafford52@gmail.com
Proudly powered by Weebly
  • Home
  • BOOKS
  • Blog
  • About
    • The Story Behind Saint Maggie